Step of Proof: before_last
11,40
postcript
pdf
Inference at
*
2
1
4
1
I
of proof for Lemma
before
last
:
1.
T
: Type
2.
T
List
3.
u
:
T
4.
v
:
T
List
5.
x
:
T
. (
x
v
)
(
(
x
= last(
v
)))
x
before last(
v
)
v
6.
x
:
T
7. (
x
v
)
8.
(
x
= last([
u
/
v
]))
(
x
= last(
v
))
latex
by ((RWO "last_cons" (-1))
CollapseTHEN ((Auto_aux (first_nat 1:n) ((first_nat 1:n),(first_nat
C
3:n)) (first_tok :t) inil_term)))
latex
C
1
: .....rewrite subgoal..... NILNIL
C1:
(
null(
v
))
C
.
Definitions
P
Q
,
P
&
Q
,
t
T
,
True
,
T
,
,
P
Q
,
P
Q
,
x
:
A
.
B
(
x
)
Lemmas
last
cons
,
true
wf
,
squash
wf
,
not
wf
origin